I've had a couple of emails asking the above question. So, there are probably several others wondering the same thing. Here's the answer:
When I travel, I always do at least two things with the pictures: make a 100 page hardback book and post some of my favorites to my blog. Sometimes I even print a poster-sized version to frame here at home. So I spend a good bit of time making the pictures print-worthy. This trip's pictures posed some challenges in that regard and are therefore taking a lot of extra time. (And as a novice to all of this, I'm already slow!)
For whatever reason, despite the constant use of compressed air and lens cleaner, two of my three lens seemed to keep dust on them. And "something" invisible to the naked eye appears to be on my 30D's image sensor. Those cursed tiny little spots! Usually, just about every single picture has to be touched in Aperture to tweak exposure settings, normalize luminance levels, and do white balance. That's all fairly fast. But most of these pictures required more detailed work in Photoshop to remove lots of spots. (While this can also be done in Aperture, I like the Photoshop workflow much better.) At its best, taking out lots of spots is tedious and time consuming to me.
I also shot all of the aerial pictures of the mountain, Denali, in camera raw format (a first for me) and had to do so directly facing the sun! I didn't want to mess up this one-time opportunity to shoot the mountain in the air. And since camera raw format gives the most control of the image after it's shot, I decided to go for it. So each of the mountain pictures has required a lot of fine-tuning to bring out the details of the images, crop out blown out areas caused by the sun in the lens, etc. Raw image parameters were completely alien to me, so I had to come up to speed on these.
And as each picture was shot through the heavily tinted glass of the airplane window, the color tinting had to be removed from each image. And, of course, 85% of the pictures of the mountain also had some piece of the airplane's wing or rudder in the picture, requiring they be cropped as well. (While strapped into the tiny seat in the super tiny plane I tried to position myself jammed next to the window to use the wing to block the direct angle of the sun as much as I could. So I really can't complain too much about the plane parts! It was a memorable experience to say the least!)
I'm also trying to caption (for the book) most of, and tag all of, the pictures this time. I've always been very bad about the former.
I think I may use a new program (the new iWeb) to generate the core code for the online photo pages. The new version has some very nice photo presentation features. But I'll have to edit each page to give the Alaska Gallery the same overall look and feel (read banner and navigation bread crumbs) of my blog's photo galleries. So, I'll first have to figure out how to do it and then touch the code on every page--read "lots of time!" I'll try to figure out a way to at least semi-automate this process. Is nothing simple any more?! :o)
All of this to say that these pictures are requiring a lot of extra work at a time when I'm busier than ever. Carving out the time has been very difficult. I hope to spend a good bit of time on them this weekend. (But I thought the same thing last weekend, too!) And they must to be done before I head off to Scotland and back to London in October!
So to answer the question: While I can't be sure, I'm hoping they will be up in a couple more weeks??? I would work on them now, but I've got to get to sleep!
Recent Comments